Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Painting the Dunes
One would think that by shear location, I would paint the Indiana National Dunes Lakeshore a lot. In truth, I rarely paint it at all. Having been born and raised in eastern Iowa, dunes and beaches weren't around me. I think because of that, I don't have any nostalgia or affinity for them. It commonly doesn't interest me. That said, however, like any place, you can always find something beautiful about an area. I often feel the abstract patterns of the dunes are not portrayed well, if at all. So I challenged myself to try to capture that wonderful abstraction where the dunes meet the grassland.
I had taken the photo of this scene a few years ago. While digging through my photo box I found it and painted a little study of it (see below). I liked the study so much I tried my hand at making it into a larger painting. Fortunately, I am not too disappointed in either of them. Though I will say, the main focal area is still trees. For some reason I can't seem to pull myself away from them.
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Madame X — Self-Censored Masterpiece
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a984d/a984d4a3f5e695b6b3313984034cdc32df97183e" alt=""
When the painting was shown in the Paris Salon of 1884, it immediately became scandalous for its suggestive sexuality, and the relatives of Mdme Gautreau requested that is be taken down. It was left hanging. Initially, Sargent was to give the painting to the Gautreaus, but after their response he feared them destroying what he considered his best work. So he took the painting down before the end of the show, where it stayed in his studio until he sent it to the Metropolitan Museum in New York. He was so ashamed by the scandal that Sargent moved to London soon after.
What I find even more amazing is what happened next. Sargent then went back into the painting and repainted the strap of the dress that hung down from Mdme. Gautreau's shoulder, and changed its name from Portrait de Mdme *** to Madame X. This changed the piece drastically. And, it was not discovered that he altered the painting for close to a hundred years, until the art scholar Trevor Fairbrother discovered it in an old photograph depicting the Salon (see below).
Funny how a little thing like a strap can change something so drastically. Below you can see the final painting as it hangs in the Met in New York, a photo of the painting as it hung in the Salon in 1884, and how it may have appeared (altered by artist Mike Pieczonka). It may no longer be seen as offensive, but in my eyes is a much weaker piece. The lowered strap changes the composition and feeling of the piece. It no longer has the feeling of a woman acknowledging her independence and sexuality. Now I see it as a true masterpiece and can believe it is one of his best works. And I wonder if he were still around today, in these times, would he change it back.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce3ee/ce3eecd670c73b0246e5e6d71e370a26e2cb2829" alt=""
http://jssgallery.org/paintings/Madame_X.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)